|
It may seem odd to consider how the people in HR departments feel about their work. They should be the people who are always positive, can always explain the strange workings of the organisation and put a positive spin on everything.
But they are people too! They are subject to the same feelings as the rest of us.
A survey by Personnel Today in the US found that 26% of respondents would not pick an HR career a second time. In fact just 60% said they would choose the same career.
The biggest factor (44%) in their career choice was the desire to work with people. The more HR becomes “handling regulations” the less the people content of the job.
Conflict resolution is a key people HR activity. Highly charged emotional disagreements are difficult to handle. Elements of post-traumatic stress can build up if the HR staff are not well looked after themselves.
There is increasing pressure to “support the business”. This may not always lead to a “fair” resolution of conflict but a legally correct decision beneficial to the organisation.
The government’s ability to introduce new legislation seems boundless. We now have biannual introductions of laws, regulations and codes that often bear directly on an organisation’s procedures, policies and processes.
The legislation sometimes produces perverse results. The Age Discrimination legislation at introduction created the need to comply but the Courts had not had time to establish case law. The only safe way for an organisation to act was to ensure that custom and practice was for everyone to retire at the “usual” ages. People who were happily working post-retirement age were suddenly asked to leave to avoid arguments on precedent! This is a frustrating working environment for the HR professional.
Today line managers are taking up many of the traditional HR roles, which is good in theory but needs good practice. This reduces the need for a day to day HR resource. Indeed there is a move to outsource HR functions completely.
Of course we should not assume that the title “HR manager” ensures the holder is fully equipped with all the pertinent motivational skills! HR people can suffer along with the rest of us! 
There are complaints from HR that they are not central to the organisation’s strategy. The regulatory regime may cause HR to oppose plans to improve performance, similar to the way that Health & Safety requirements sometimes do.
So is HR about to become an outsourced function and be a cost on the organisation. Or could it deliver genuine, strategically vital benefits?
My current thinking is we need to put the “human resources” back into HR and think about what those humans should be doing. HR has an opportunity to bring across the board performance improvements to the organisation by changing the general “willingness to work” of the staff.
HR should take on the strategic role of creating the best culture in the organisation: a culture that makes everyone work harder, more effectively and smarter.
If HR does not sponsor these improvements, Operations or the CEO may ask why not!
Clearly there are many changes going on. It is a difficult time to be in HR.
You can help by introducing performance enhancing improvements. Be the solution.
People make the difference when motivation matters.
|